How Obama Embraces Islam's Sharia Agenda: A Creed for the Poor and Disadvantaged
a book by Andrew C. McCarthy
(our site's book review)
The Amazon blurb says that While Americans focus on terrorism, a more insidious Islamist threat to our way of life lurks. It is the agenda of sharia, Islam’s authoritarian legal and political system. The global Islamist movement aims, in the words of the international Muslim Brotherhood, to destroy the West by sabotaging it from within. Its principal strategy is not mass-murder but the exploitation of Western freedoms and the insinuation of sharia principles into Western legal systems. Because those principles are hostile to our core liberties – indeed, hostile even to the bedrock premise that people are free to govern themselves as they see fit – sharia’s advance gradually undermines our culture.
The Ayatollah Trumpowski is the spiritual leader for the Trumpist base, who Hillary called the basket of deplorables—we find the way he has denigrated political correctness very encouraging
The Ayatollah Trumpowski is the spiritual leader for the Trumpist base, who Hillary called the basket of deplorables
The sharia agenda has found a friend in the Obama administration, which has embraced its vanguard, including the Brotherhood and the Organization of the Islamic Conference. President Obama was actively abetting the Islamist platform: promoting sharia in his foreign policy, easing enforcement of laws that stop Islamic “charities” from diverting funds to jihadist terror, and even sponsoring a United Nations resolution that – under the guise of insulating Islam from criticism – would stifle First Amendment rights.
Did Barack HUSSEIN Obama II support the Muslim Brotherhood because he believed in their cause or was he merely giving the USA the finger? (Or both?)
The Justice Department is working to tighten the Democratic Party’s grip on power, ignoring the Constitution and green-lighting election fraud and abuse while enhancing due process for terrorists
"When President Sadat released Muslim Brothers from prison in the 1970s, they were allowed to rebuild their organization, and eventually, under Mubarak, they once again participated in elections. The group “abandoned” violence then because it was unnecessary and futile. Although soldiery and violence is not central to the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated methodology for social and political change, at least in the initial stages, it features in Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna’s writings and vision for an ideal Muslim society. The group may have been non-violent since the 1970s, but it was never pacifist, and this proved to be key when the Brotherhood faced its first true adversity since the abrupt end of its decades long détente with the Egyptian state in 2013. . . . Those who advocate such violence do not call it so, as violence to them has a negative connotation. Rather, they deem it to be a form of legitimate defensive Jihad or “resistance.” . . . This is the transformation. The Muslim Brothers have indeed changed." (Source: The Rise of the Violent Muslim Brotherhood, Mokhtar Awad, Hudson)
"Although violent groups like Hamas and al-Qaeda evolved from the Muslim Brotherhood, most counterterrorism experts do not consider the Muslim Brotherhood itself a terrorist organization, at least one that should be designated as such by the U.S. State Department. This is true even of analysts who believe the Muslim Brotherhood should be treated as an adversary hostile to the West. . . . 'Every Muslim institution in this country has already been subjected to extreme vetting,' [Corey] Saylor said. 'And if there were anything nefarious about any Muslim institution, they would already be in jail at this point.' . . . 'I think the possibility of another Salem witch trial is always a reality,' he said." (Source: How One Policy Change Could Wipe Out Muslim Civil Liberties, David Noriega, Buzzfeed)
Corey Saylor said: "If there were anything nefarious about any Muslim institution, they would already be in jail at this point. . . . I think the possibility of another Salem witch trial is always a reality" Note: Saylor is Director of CAIR National’s Department to Monitor & Combat Islamophobia but is this person too good at getting citizens to let their guard down about Muslim infiltration?
"Social service provision has been a core activity for the Muslim Brotherhood since the early 1930s, predating the group's political mobilization. The Brotherhood has long viewed social outreach as a way to demonstrate its ideological commitment to alleviating poverty, reducing inequality and increasing social responsibility." (Source: Between Piety and Politics: Social Services and the Muslim Brotherhood, Nadine Farag, PBS)
The Obama White House has facilitated the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the Middle East, helping it come to power in Cairo, bankrolling it and giving it F-16s that are likely someday to be used against Israel, and displayed weakness in Syria by ignoring "red lines" it said would never be crossed. It is a low point for America, as David Horowitz shows in How Obama Betrayed America....And No One Is Holding Him Accountable, with Republicans, traditionally the party of strong national security, offering only an echo, not a choice in American foreign policy, watching in a state of policy paralysis as Obozo appeases our enemies and enables their evil ambitions. David Horowitz reveals Obama for what he is: a criminal and a traitor to America. Did we really want a leader who used intimidation, threats, and smears against private citizens and who aided Islamist supremacists like the Muslim Brotherhood in their global war of conquest?
Obama wants you to believe I AM NOT A CROOK, but you know better—he should have been impeached!
Horowitz tells us that "Although the President [Obama] learned about the [Benghazi embassy in Libya] attack shortly after it began and although the embattled Americans inside the compound begged the White House for help, and although U.S. fighter jets were stationed in Italy only an hour away, the president, in one of the most shameful acts in the history of that office, denied help . . ." Horowitz is entirely correct to abhor this.
"Obama’s and Hillary’s lies about the Benghazi massacre confirm, once and for all, that they are twin moral vacuums. They deserve all of the scorn, disrespect, and rejection that such a disgraceful distinction demands." (Source: Hillary Clinton and Obama’s Lies on Benghazi — Too Many to Count, but Let’s Try, Deroy Murdock, National Review)
Obama has betrayed our national security. Horowitz is right—including his claim that O'Bomb'em's bungling led to the rise of ISIS. Horowitz notes that "Michele Bachmann and four other Republican House members sent a letter to the Justice Department’s Inspector General asking him to look into the possibility of Islamist influence in the Obama Administration. The letter expressed concern about State Department policies that 'appear to be a result of influence operations conducted by individuals and organizations associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.'" Rather than the needed inquiry, the result of the letter was to demonize Bachmann and her colleagues, even though there is lots of evidence that various administration personnel and their relatives are closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Frank Gaffney said of Muslims, 'They essentially, like termites, hollow out the structure of the civil society and other institutions, for the purpose of creating conditions under which the jihad will succeed.'
Frank Gaffney (Center for Security Policy) has said the Muslim Brotherhood is the most dangerous group promoting the totalitarian and Islamist supremacist doctrine of Shariah. Several Muslim Brotherhood supporters have been identified as key advisers to Mr. Obama, according to Mr. Gaffney. He has the belief that Muslim enemies of the United States are hidden in plain sight and organizing through mainstream Muslim rights organizations. He said of Muslims, “They essentially, like termites, hollow out the structure of the civil society and other institutions, for the purpose of creating conditions under which the jihad will succeed.” Is he right? It is hard to say—we only know that Obama, their biggest supporter, created ISIS with his mideast bungling. Coincidence? Who can say?
Al-Qaeda ideologues like Osama bin Laden have used their interpretation of sharia to justify terrorist attacks (Sharia)
Terrorist Osama bin Laden
"The first thing to understand about the jihadis who operate by stealth is that they have precisely the same dual objectives as the openly violent jihadists (including al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas and the Taliban): global imposition of sharia and re-establishment of the Islamic caliphate to rule in accordance with it. They differ only with respect to timing and tactics. In fact, the seemingly innocuous outreach tactics of dawa are merely part of the initial stages of what the U.S. military would call 'intelligence preparation of the battlefield' that is calculated favorably to sculpt the terrain over the long term, preceding the ultimate, violent seizure of the U.S. government and replacement of the U.S. Constitution with sharia.
We were the bull in a china shop, the international bullies that did as we pleased
We were the international bullies that did as we pleased—who could stop us?
Think about it. The U.S. military decided that it could attack Iraq and Afghanistan, killing anyone who didn't like it, with thousands of civilians killed as "collateral damage," which is America-speak for "oops!" We did this because we had and have superior military power. We were the bullies that no one invited in and no one wanted there, except the U.S. oligarchs profiting from the war. We were the bull in a china shop, the international bullies, the clumsy giants. The Islamics couldn't beat us militarily, so they infiltrated our society in order to destroy us from within and replace the U.S. Constitution with sharia. If they were powerful and attacked us unprovoked, wouldn't we pull out all the stops to respond by retaliating and infiltrating their society and replacing their society with a democracy?
We were the clumsy giants who did as we pleased wherever we wished to do it—the world and our own citizens said no, but those in charge did not heed our cries
We pushed our poor and unemployed to 'be all you can be' in the military, and they were used as expendable cannon fodder by our leaders and the oligarchs that raked in war profits
There are different flavors of sharia: "Shariah is the crucial fault line of Islam’s internecine struggle. On one side of the divide are Muslim reformers and authentic moderates . . . whose members embrace
the Enlightenment’s veneration of reason and, in particular, its separation of the spiritual and secular realms.
On this side of the divide, shariah is a reference point for a Muslim’s personal conduct, not a corpus to be imposed on the life of a pluralistic society.
"By contrast, the other side of the divide is dominated by Muslim supremacists, often called Islamists. Like erstwhile proponents of Communism and Nazism, these supremacists – some terrorists, others employing stealthier means – seek to impose a totalitarian regime: a global totalitarian system cloaked as an Islamic state and called a caliphate. [Don't take our word for it, look ino their own documents and see for yourself] On that side of the divide, which is the focus of the present study, shariah is an immutable, compulsory system that Muslims are obliged to install and the world required to adopt, the failure to do so being deemed a damnable offence against Allah. For these ideologues, shariah is not a private matter. Adherents see the West as an obstacle to be overcome, not a culture and civilization to be embraced, or at least tolerated. It is impossible, they maintain, for alternative legal systems and forms of governments peacefully to coexist with the end-state they seek.
"Particularly problematic have been the concerted efforts made by successive U.S. administrations to embrace the Muslim Brotherhood, both here and abroad. As established above, this organization has as its mission 'the destruction of Western civilization from within…by its own miserable hand and that of the Brothers.'" (Source: Shariah: The Threat to America: An Exercise In Competitive Analysis (Report of Team B II), Patrick Poole, Joseph E. Schmitz, etc., Center for Security Policy Press)
There are way too many liberals in our government whose main life strategies are centered upon multiculturalism and political correctness—foolish notions they got from our PC-obsessed hyper-liberal education systems, making us easy targets for Islam's sharia
Why do we have patience for a conspiracy, an organization of supremists disguised as a religion, whose stated goal is the destruction of Western civilization from within? Why are we pursuing accommodation as a preferred mode of interaction? It turns out that there are way too many liberals in our government whose main life strategies are centered upon multiculturalism and political correctness—foolish notions they got from our PC-obsessed hyper-liberal education systems in the U.S. which spend less of their time on real education, and more of their time on indoctrinating young minds about bending over more than backwards in accommodating minorities—and Muslims. With such mindsets, we are easy targets for Islam's sharia invasion.
This book effectively makes the case that, besides terrorism, another insidious Islamist threat to our way of life lurks: the agenda of sharia
How Obama Embraces Islam's Sharia Agenda: A Creed for the Poor and Disadvantaged effectively makes the case that, besides terrorism, another insidious Islamist threat to our way of life lurks. It is the agenda of sharia, Islam’s authoritarian legal and political system. Islam's infiltration campaign is well under way, and since our leaders never take the time to really learn about what is occurring and what it's goals are, we are basically wide-eyed innocent sitting ducks. From the standpoint of U.S. security, this is an important, must-read book.
Since our leaders never take the time to really learn about what is occurring in sharia and what it's nonbenign goals are, we are basically wide-eyed innocent sitting ducks