Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington
a book by Paul Sperry
(our site's book review)
The most sinister terrorists won't be sneaking through our borders from the Middle East. They're already here, says Paul Sperry, author of Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington.
Paul Sperry is an investigative journalist and Hoover Institution media fellow. His articles have appeared in the New York Post, Investor's Business Daily, and The Wall Street Journal. Sperry makes regular appearances on Fox News and other national media outlets.
This is the untold story about the silent, yet extremely dangerous threat from the Muslim establishment in America—an alarming exposé of how Muslims have for years been secretly infiltrating American society, government, and culture, pretending to be peace-loving and patriotic, while supporting violent jihad and working to turn America into an Islamic state, which would extinguish women's rights, gay rights, minority rights and the rights of all minority religions to flourish.
In this powder keg of a book, you'll learn:
- How radical Muslims have penetrated the U.S. military, the FBI, the Homeland Security Department, and even the White House, where subversive Muslims and Arabs have received top-secret clearance.
- How they've infiltrated the chaplains program in the federal and state prison systems—a top recruiting ground for al-Qaida.
- How they've successfully run influence operations against our political system with the help of both Democrats and Republicans, badgering corporate boards into Islamizing the workplace.
- How we've been utterly duped about what the Quran does and doesn't teach. Sadly, much of anti-Western terrorism is simply Islam in practice, the text of the Quran in action.
Islamic praying (for the day the U.S. turns into an Islamic state?)
Sperry has previously been the Washington Bureau Chief at Investor's Business Daily and WorldNetDaily. He wrote articles critical of George W. Bush for his decision to initiate the 2003 invasion of Iraq, accusing Bush of lying about the motivation for the Iraq War.
Sperry accused Dubya Bush of lying about the motivation for the Iraq war and thought the attack was wrong
He wrote pieces in The Wall Street Journal and made regular appearances on Fox News and other media outlets. He currently regularly writes Op-Ed pieces for the New York Post.
One of Sperry's most important pieces is his analysis of the actions of the administration of former President Barack Obama during the 2016 presidential election concluding the Obama Team abused intelligence gathering abilities and violated privacy protections in an effort to hurt the candidacy of President Donald Trump. See The Corruption Chronicles: Obama's Big Secrecy, Big Corruption, and Big Government.
Obama says 'I am not a crook,' but you know better
Paul Sperry argued that Islamic extremists are using the media, government, and U.S. citizens to turn America into an Islamic state. The author explained that Muslim businessmen and scholars who appear to be patriotic are taking advantage of the American way of life to further their agenda of destroying America’s constitutional government. Mr. Sperry cited examples of prevalent and systemic anti-American activity by large parts of the Muslim community and the subversive activities of specific individuals. He also cited security and intelligence activities compromised by Muslim employees.
Sperry tells us "Washington hasn't leveled with us about the full scope and depth of the Islamic threat not only inside America but inside the government, just as it hasn't leveled with us about the true nature of Islam. We've been lulled into a false sense of security, and we're just inviting another 9/11. So I wrote this book to expose the elaborate fraud that's been orchestrated by our leaders in the Washington establishment and the leaders in the Muslim establishment, who are playing us all for suckers. Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington is 350 pages of cold hard politically incorrect facts the American people haven't heard since 9/11 and deserve to hear without the PC spin from Washington. At first some will feel mugged by the truth, but then it will make you hustle-proof about the Islamic threat, which is my goal—to simply arm you with the facts." (Source: Infiltration, Jamie Glazov, FrontPageMag)
According to Sperry, Islamic spies and agents have infiltrated every security agency from the FBI to the Pentagon to the prison system, which is the top recruiting ground for al-Qaida right now. They use our political correctness ideals and our anti-discrimination laws to scam their way into places in government so they can represent Islamic values that are anti-American and subversive. They've taken advantage of the openness of U.S. society to undermine our ideals, our secrets, our intelligence agencies, and our secrets. And the people who are supposed to be protecting us from another 9/11 are busy putting the infidel agents through Muslim sensitivity training while promoting the Muslims who threaten to sue for discrimination. PC has blown up in our American faces, which is why it is good Trump won the presidency. Hillary was obsessed with spreading PC everywhere and she was buying the idea of blacks are victims and whites are racists. She was going to be Obama 2.0 in a skirt—and we do NOT need that! See 'Don't Make the Black Kids Angry': The hoax of black victimization and those who enable it.
According to Sperry, Islamic spies and agents have infiltrated every security agency from the FBI to the Pentagon to the prison system, which is the top recruiting ground for al-Qaida right now
"You'd think PC would have died out with the last flames at Ground Zero, but it's still alive and well here in Washington," says Sperry. Dubya Bush made a pledge to never describe terrorism as Islamic—you'll never hear him say "Islamic terrorism" either. And he got FBI director Bob Mueller to do the same. (Later, Obama did the same thing, to please the PC crowd and because he liked Islamics more than Americans.)
Political correctness first, security second. It's a terrible priority system for leaders of the U.S. to adopt! It started with Clinton, kept going with Dubya, and went hogwild with the corrupt Obama administration. See The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama.
Sperry says that Islam is a religion of peace for Muslims. Non-Muslims are marked for punishment. He explains this in a chapter called "Top 10 Myths of Islam." The Quran reads like a manual of war, he says. However, most people who have examined both the Bible and the Quran know that each is half full of peace, wisdom, and compassion, and half full of violence, hate, intolerance, homophobia, sexism, and war. BOTH advise abusing children by beating them with rods. Sperry seems not to notice any of this.
The U.S. insists on running around the world wrecking countries like a bull in a china shop—the world strongly wishes we'd stop it
The U.S. thinks that Might Makes Right, but continues to prove that Might Makes Stupid
But since the CIA installing of the corrupt Shah in Iran and the U.S. making lucrative corporatocracy deals with Mideast leaders, many Islamics can see that sneaky imperialism (updated Crusading) is afoot. But two can play this game. The Islamics gave as good as they got a thousand years ago in the Crusades, so their decision to do a little reverse imperialism and to slowly transform America into an Islamic state is simply a sneakier and less bloody way to keep the Crusades tit-for-tat game going. They don't like us undermining them anymore than we like it when they do it. We invade Iraq and call it democratizing, but they call it terrorism. Some of them put up resistance to having their country wrecked and they called that resistance against mad dog Americans, but we called them terrorists. Say, folks, who is fooling whom?
Osama bin Laden
But let's look at this century. A troublemaker named Osama bin Laden inspired Saudi fanatics to go claim their 72 virgins in paradise by pulling that 9/11 attack. Dubya used this as an excuse to do what he's been Jonesing to do anyway—attack Iraq to get control of their oil, while getting Cheney rich due to Halliburton making a killing there and sending the bill to U.S. taxpayers. Over the next 14 years, the U.S. wrecked Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya and they're working on Yemen and Syria as well. They also got the CIA to control Afghani illegal drugs and the corporatocracy is slathering over Mideast oil but also minerals as well. U.S. imperialism is trying to do to the Mideast what it was doing to Central and South America and Africa in the 20th century. See The Concise Untold History of the United States.
Why can't we just be peacemakers and stay home? Greed. They come up with one cover story after another, but the corporatocracy oligarchs and neocons in charge make more money when we are building American Empire than when they stay home and think peaceful thoughts (which the rest of the world wants us to do), so the choice is easy: empire it is. They think nothing of using our soldiers as cannon fodder along the way as they're stuffing their money bins with undeserved wealth conned from U.S. taxpayers via warmongering. See Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power to see just HOW badly citizens are being screwed. It's much worse than you imagine. And yet none of this is about Islamics—it's just U.S. oligarchs' and neocons' infinite greed!
Oligarchs think nothing of using our soldiers as cannon fodder along the way as they're stuffing their money bins with undeserved wealth conned from U.S. taxpayers via warmongering
The longterm Islamic plan may be to sabotage our government and our security from the inside until we collapse like a house of cards while they laugh
So the Crusades game is back in action, but in more subtle ways. The Islamics have cost us a few thousand lives. But the U.S. Christians (70% of the U.S.) and non-Christians have cost the Islamics millions of lives. Folks, what we have here is simply a game of catch-up. As much as we citizens hate it, it seems only "fair." Whether the longterm Islamic plan is (a) to set us up for terrorist attacks which our damnably foolish PC proclivities will make us sitting ducks for, or whether the plan is (b) to set us up for Iranian nukes which they're working on in underground bunkers but lying about, or whether the plan is (c) to sabotage our government and our security from the inside until we collapse like a house of cards while they laugh, no one knows. According to many, the Islamics are trying to lure us into an all-out battle in the Mideast, where Armageddon and the Rapture will occur and the faithful will be taken by angels to go see Allah or God in heaven while the infidels and unfaithful experience a hell on Earth before going to the actual Hell. Quite a story, huh? We forgot the Antichrist part, but Obama, Trump, or whoever will do as stand-ins while central casting argues over which demagogue to send.
When Armageddon occurs, the faithful will be taken by angels to go see Allah or God in heaven while the infidels and unfaithful experience a hell on Earth
A Bible-thumping fundamentalist preacher preaching Hell and damnation and the Rapture
Of course, while we are thanking Sperry for this heads-up about the Infiltration, let us notice that this all screams out to us one singular question: what is there about religion that makes people so insanely hateful, violent, homicidal, or even genocidal? The answer is threefold:
- Both the Bible and the Koran are full of violent actions taken by both God and holy book characters and both tomes condone slavery as long as the slaves are unbelievers. "An eye for an eye" is a conflict-extending strategy. "Love thine enemy" is advice that is rarely taken seriously by either holy book characters or those that read said tomes. Examples in holy books that get emulated are rarely the peace-loving ones where there are negotiations and reasonable verbal conflict resolution. The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. In addition, the Old Testament is a 'book filled with...the violence of God'. (Buddhism has tons of violence as does Hinduism.)
- Because the preachers of these two religions have such violent books to preach from, some of these preachers take such things seriously and actually condone hate and even violence in subtle or disguised form. An example would be preaching what a terrible thing abortion is and implying that "such sinners should atone for their sins." The ignorant, mentally ill, and unstable among the congregations take this as an 007 license to kill.
- The biggest answer to "where is all the hate coming from" is easily found in the child-raising methods of most cultures on the planet. Said methods result in win-lose character structures primed for conflict, hate, war, and killing. See Flat-gradient Nurturance versus Steep-gradient Nurturance.
The Bible really does advise child abuse!
Prov 23:13: "Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die."
Prov 23:14: "Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell (Shoel)."
Let's look at the Crusades, asking ourselves if it was spreading the love parts of the Bible or the violence and war parts
Let's look at the Crusades, asking ourselves if it was spreading the love parts of the Bible or the violence and war parts, and in the process attempting to acquire territory, converts, and power to massage a pope's ego.
Dubya tried to look like a Crusader to the millions of religious fundamentalists in his base and like a spreader of democracy to the rest. Both cover stories were untrue
"The Crusades consolidated the papal leadership of the Latin Church, reinforcing the link between Western Christendom, feudalism, and militarism and increased the tolerance of the clergy to violence. The growth of the system of indulgences became a catalyst for the Protestant Reformation in the early 16th century. The Crusades also had a role in the creation and institutionalisation of the military and the Dominican orders as well as the Medieval Inquisition. The behavior of the Crusaders appalled the Greeks and Muslims, creating a lasting barrier between the Latin world and both the Islamic and Orthodox religions. . . . Historical parallelism and the tradition of drawing inspiration from the Middle Ages have become keystones of Islamic ideology. Secular Arab Nationalism concentrates on the idea of Western Imperialism. Gamal Abdel Nasser [President of Egypt] likened himself to Saladin and imperialism to the Crusades. In his History of the Crusades Sa'id Ashur emphasised the similarity between the modern and medieval situation facing Muslims and the need to study the Crusades in depth. Sayyid Qutb declared there was an international Crusader conspiracy. The ideas of Jihad and a long struggle have developed some currency. . . . 18th century Enlightenment historians tended to view the Middle Ages in general, and the Crusades in particular, as the efforts of barbarian cultures driven by fanaticism. These scholars expressed moral outrage at the conduct of the Crusaders." (Source: Crusades)
18th century Enlightenment historians tended to view the Middle Ages in general, and the Crusades in particular, as the efforts of barbarian cultures driven by fanaticism—and then came the Medieval Inquisition
Are any of you seeing love in any of this crap? Religion simply seems like an excuse to act like savage, rabid animals and go kill, kill, kill. It sure is for some. However, people are known for what they do, not what they say. Millions are using religion to inspire compassion and doing good and millions more are using it only to inspire war, hate, death, and the Rapture. Millions want nothing to do with religion, but they, too, spread compassion and they, too, are doing good. But there is yet another, smaller group called oligarchs, that don't care about stuff like religion; they know that if they play the citizens for suckers and exploit them, they themselves will get richer and more powerful: their only goal in life. Question: Why are we letting these oligarchs exploit us this way? Aren't we sick of being played for fools while they invent clever cover stories to cover their treachery? "War on Terrorism" our Aunt Fanny! "Democratization" our Aunt Fanny! Their cover stories are horse-pucky.
Why are we letting these oligarchs exploit us this way? Aren't we sick of being played for fools while they invent clever cover stories to cover their treachery?
Sperry's book says that we have to penetrate the terror support network that just happens to be operating within the Muslim community, and permanently dismantle it. We know OBomb'em would never have risked offending his Muslim brothers, but Trump has no such qualms. Sperry says Muslim leaders talk a good game, but they don't have our best interests at heart, and that's well-documented in his book. Some of the pillars of the Muslim community have privately called for overturning our system of government, replacing the Constitution with the Qur’an as the highest authority in the land. We can just see a future liberal president, oozing with political correctness, allowing the Quran to replace the Constitution just so as not to offend our Muslim friends! Maybe they'd get the NSA to burn it since they weren't honoring it anyway.
A future liberal president, oozing with political correctness, may allow the Quran to replace the Constitution just so as not to offend our Muslim friends! Maybe they'd get the NSA to burn it!
Mostly federal law enforcement personnel were the sources Sperry used for his book. He conducted exclusive interviews with some two dozen counterterrorism veterans at the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and U.S. military intelligence, most of whom are frustrated by the stubborn PC in Washington that has hamstrung their efforts to penetrate the terror support syndicate inside America.
Sperry offers a number of solutions to Infiltration in the back of his book, in the Afterword, but for starters,
- We need to be smarter about who we hire to help us fight this war on Islamic terror
- We need to do a better job of screening Muslim translators to ensure their loyalty
- We need to stop cutting corners on their background checks