To link to this article from your blog or webpage, copy and paste the url below into your blog or homepage.
All for One and Theft for All--The Fallacy of the Social-Justice Movement
a book by Carl Teichrib
(our site's book review)
The Amazon blurb says that
The dominant social-justice concept for the past 150 years has been centered on the sliding slope of papal-advocated wealth redistribution, alongside a Marxist version of collectivism. Feeding the poor and assisting the helpless, from a Christian perspective, isn’t social justice—its biblical compassion, a generous act of love. Such acts of compassion engage individual lives and are based on the Christian call of loving others more than self. This is the heart of compassion: An individual sees a need and operating out of love, reaches to meet that need. Churches too are to function in a similar manner. A need is evident, and moved by compassion, the congregation works to solve the dilemma. Coercion never enters the picture, nor does a political agenda emerge, nor is a call for economic equality heard.

The biblical parable of the Good Samaritan demonstrates true compassion (Luke 10), while the liberal version isn’t about truly helping the victim; it’s about using the victim
The biblical parable of the Good Samaritan demonstrates true compassion (Luke 10). A Jewish man has been beaten, robbed, and left to die on the road. Various people pass him by, including the religiously pious. However, a Samaritan traveler sees the individual, and although the Samaritan is culturally alienated from the Jewish man, he recognizes the desperation and individually takes action—dressing his wounds and providing a place of rest and refuge. And the Samaritan pays for it himself without demanding remuneration or compensation, either from the victim, his family, or community, or from the government or ruling class. However, if the Samaritan were a supporter of the dominant theme in social justice, he would have acted with a different motive for different ends. The Samaritan would have used the occasion to lobby for social transformation:

Who will pay the victim’s medical bills? The community or the rich? Answer: Neither. The Samaritan pays for it himself without demanding remuneration or compensation
The robbers were really victims of an unjust economic system and had acted in response to the oppression of the capital class. In order to bring justice to this oppressed class and to steer them back to a caring community, equitable wealth redistribution should take place. Who will pay the victim’s medical bills? The community or the rich?
In the social-justice framework, another agenda lurks behind the tragedy: A political/economic cause is piggybacked and leveraged—the cause of economic equality through wealth redistribution. This isn’t about truly helping the victim; it’s about using the victim. Biblical justice, on the other hand, never seeks to dismantle class structures. Evil actions are condemned, but this isn’t specific to a particular social strata. Consider the words of Leviticus 19:15, “Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect [be partial to] the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.”In other words, according to the Bible, true justice means we do not show partiality to someone based on whether he or she is poor or is rich, but rather true justice is based on the standards of righteousness that God has put forth in His Word. God made us different from each other. We are unequal in aptitude, talent, skill, work ethic, priorities, etc. Inevitably, these differences result in some individuals producing and earning far more wealth than others. To the extent that those in the social-justice crowd obsess about eliminating economic inequality, they are at war with the nature of the Creator’s creation.

To the extent that those in the social-justice crowd obsess about eliminating economic inequality, they are at war with the nature of the Creator’s creation
As Teichrib says, "It is necessary to understand that every modern theory of social justice is ideological. No matter how reasonable or rational it may be, every modern theory of social justice is the rationalization of the interests of a particular group or class. —William E. Murnion, a socialist professor

The working stiffs who were glad to have work but not so glad about the drudgery and dirty, dusty factory

A brick-lined smokestack was silhouetted against the evening sky, and smoke — or steam (it didn’t matter) — was belching forth to choke out nature’s life

The fabric they wove
As Teichrib says, "As we loaded up with fabric and left this urban wasteland, I caught a glimpse of something else. A brick-lined smokestack was silhouetted against the evening sky, and smoke — or steam (it didn’t matter) — was belching forth to choke out nature’s life. That’s when I lost it. Didn’t those people know what they were doing? Didn’t anybody in the government have a brain? Not only was the city a depressing place and the warehouses terrible for workers, but the factories were going to kill everything! When I grew-up, I was going to put a stop to this madness. Others would join in this desire to change the world. We would save the worker from his intolerable slavery and rescue the environment from the hands of greedy merchantmen. Justice, or vengeance, would be served — whether at home or abroad."

Infamous socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the anti-Semitic Hamas terrorist-loving woman needing to be kicked out of Congress along with her anti-Semitic Hamas terrorist-loving squad buddies; UGH!
In United States of Socialism: Who's Behind It. Why It's Evil. How to Stop It., a pathbreaking book, bestselling author Dinesh D’Souza argues that the socialism advanced today by the likes of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [the anti-Semitic woman who has no compassion for Jews but plenty for the Hamas monsters that burned alive hundreds of Jews, including children, after raping and torturing them], Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omar and Elizabeth Warren (radical leftists) is very different from the socialism of Lenin, Mao and Castro. It is “identity socialism,” a marriage between classic socialism and identity politics. Today’s socialists claim to model themselves not on Mao’s Great Leap Forward or even Venezuelan socialism but rather on the “socialism that works” in Scandinavian countries like Norway and Sweden. There is a reason that Marxism is the major belief of the Black Lives Matter crowd. It is the fundamental belief system of the socialists/liberals/bleeding hearts, even if they cannot admit it since it is anti-American as well as being exactly what the Chinese hope we believe so it will be easier to win the war they plan on starting with us in a few years.

Socialist Bernie Sanders
D’Souza chillingly documents the full range of lawless, gangster, and authoritarian tendencies that they have adopted. He reveals how it uses the Venezuelan, not the Scandinavian, formula, even though the liberals believe—or say they believe—they copy the Scandinavian formula. The country the elites envision is to be a utopia of socialistic equality, with the tiny exception of the elites running it—who will slowly evolve into an aristocrisy of the powerful elites lording it over the sheeple. It will be the new Feudalism—serfs carrying royalty.

The country the elites envision is to be a utopia of socialistic equality, with the tiny exception of the elites running it—who will slowly evolve into an aristocrisy of the powerful elites lording it over the sheeple. It will be the new Feudalism—serfs carrying royalty

The country the elites envision is to be a utopia of socialistic equality, with the tiny exception of the elites running it—who will slowly evolve into an aristocrisy of the powerful elites lording it over the sheeple

The country the elites envision is to be a utopia of socialistic equality, with the tiny exception of the elites running it—who will slowly evolve into an aristocrisy of the powerful elites lording it over the sheeple
All for One and Theft for All--The Fallacy of the Social-Justice Movement is a good book. But George Soros will hate it. It exposes his Marxist scheme to destroy the U.S.A.





